Independent Eliot Cutler: Maine Can Work

SIGN UP FOR CAMPAIGN UPDATES

Please enter a valid email address


Keeping Pace Button


GENERAL INFO

CUTLER 2010 HEADQUARTERS
305 Commercial St.
Portland, ME 04101

MAILING ADDRESS
Cutler 2010
P.O. Box 15277
Portland, ME 04112


(207) 699-4401


MEDIA INQUIRIES

For media inquiries, contact



GENERAL INFO

CUTLER 2010 HEADQUARTERS
305 Commercial St.
Portland, ME 04101

MAILING ADDRESS
Cutler 2010
P.O. Box 15277
Portland, ME 04112


(207) 699-4401


MEDIA INQUIRIES

For media inquiries, contact

Eliot's Blog

Eliot's Blog

‘No Excuses’ Education Reform

February 12th, 2010

This blog post also appeared as an op-ed in the Times-Record on February 12th.

Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont received their report cards earlier this month from NECAPS, the new multi-state consortium that assesses the performance of our education systems. Maine finished third and last among our three neighbors in both reading and math for grades three through eight.   “Maine’s performance is sound,” said a spokesman for the state Department of Education. “We’re where we hoped we’d be.”

Well, this isn’t where I want Maine to be, and I’ll bet that it’s not where most Maine voters want Maine to be — whether they are parents of school-age children or retirees worried about the future of Maine’s economy. Bluntly, we are failing our children, denying them the opportunity to reach their highest potential in an increasingly competitive world.

Maine needs to innovate, to hold educators accountable for student performance and to create a culture of expectations and achievement that gives every Maine kid a fair shot at success, wherever she or he lives in Maine. To do this, we need to make excellence, quality, performance and efficiency our touchstones.

The facts are as plain and harsh as the glare of a full moon on a clear winter night.  Maine has one of the most expensive public school systems in the nation, yet too many young people are graduating from high school without being ready for either college or skilled employment.  We are doing many things well, but there are twice as many lower performing and less efficient schools and school districts in Maine than there are higher performing and more efficient schools and districts.

It’s time to insist on reform and to get smarter about how we use our resources, so that we can eliminate this achievement gap and raise our statewide performance results.

While Maine’s public school enrollment has been steadily declining, across the state we have continued to build expensive new schools with excess capacity.

Our student-teacher ratio has become the most favorable in the nation at 9:1 versus a national average of almost 16:1. If we increase our student-teacher ratio to 13.5:1 — the average of several rural states that are currently performing as well or better than Maine — we would save $400 million each year.

We could invest some of those savings in reforms that will make a real difference to our kids:

  • Negotiate a statewide teachers’ contract that makes teaching and education leadership a true profession with advancement opportunities.
  • Increase teacher compensation. (Maine’s average teacher salary is about $9,000 less than the national average.)
  • Provide merit pay and performance bonuses for teachers that are linked to student growth and achievement. Eliminate the Maine law that creates a firewall between teacher evaluation and pupil performance.
  • Make vocational and technical education broadly available so that Maine will be ready to replace our aging skilled workforce and keep jobs here.
  • Increase the length of the school day and the school year in elementary and secondary schools. Maine’s school year is 175 days, while it’s 180 days in New Hampshire and 31 other states, and well over 200 days in China (where the school day is also about 30 percent longer).
  • Use existing facilities to create magnet high schools for foreign languages at University of Maine at Fort Kent, for agricultural sciences at University of Maine at Presque Isle, for marine sciences at University of Maine at Machias and for creative arts in Lewiston-Auburn.
  • Merge our two separate systems of higher education — the University of Maine system and our community colleges — and operate a fully integrated Pre-K to lifetime public education system.

Finally, let’s tear down the bureaucratic and political walls that protect mediocrity and keep out innovation. Let’s authorize charter schools and charter districts in Maine. Let’s take a fresh look at education by creating exciting new places of learning designed around the needs of students, their families and the community.

President Obama’s “Race to the Top” education initiative will bring hundreds of millions of dollars to states that qualify by authorizing charter schools and pursuing other reforms. Maine will lose out, because the Democratic leadership in the Legislature bowed to the teachers’ union and defeated the bill that would have allowed charter schools. Instead of joining the Race to the Top, we will continue to scrape along the bottom.

Maine’s system of public education needs strong leadership from the top, from the Blaine House.

We need a governor with the courage and independence to put kids first, a governor who won’t rest until all Maine children receive a quality education, a governor who will be a champion for innovation.  Hardworking Maine taxpayers who want the best for their children need a governor who will end duplication, fragmentation and inefficiency.  Maine needs a governor who understands that economic activity, jobs and incomes require an educated and skilled workforce.

We need a No Excuses policy of education reform. When I am governor, we will have it.



Eliot Speaks with ABC-7/FOX Bangor About His ‘Plan for Maine’

February 9th, 2010

Eliot recently sat down with Tony Consiglio from ABC-7/FOX Bangor as part of of ‘Race for the Blaine House’ series. Below is the entire three-part interview:

WVII INTERVIEW: PART I

WVII INTERVIEW: PART II

WVII INTERVIEW: PART III


Merry Christmas, Nebraska

December 23rd, 2009

David Axelrod’s nose grew three inches the other day.  

President Obama’s senior advisor told America last weekend that the single state and special interest ornaments hanging from the Senate health care bill are par for the course.  “That’s the way it has been. That’s the way it will always be.”

He’s wrong, and in Maine we know he’s wrong.

Senator Olympia Snowe has had as close a vantage point on the legislative process as anyone, and she thinks that the Senate has failed.  “The credibility of the process will determine the credibility of the outcome,” she said in a press release issued by her office, and she clearly doesn’t think that either the process or the outcome makes the grade.

This respect for the importance of a legislative process that creates a foundation for public trust runs in the DNA of Maine Senators, from Margaret Chase Smith to Edmund Muskie to Olympia Snowe.  It was Senator Smith who blew the whistle on Senator Joseph McCarthy’s abuse of the Senate’s investigatory process with her Declaration of Conscience speech.  And after dozens of days of hearings and committee meetings, Ed Muskie achieved unanimous Senate votes for passage of both the Clean Air Act of 1970 and the Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, two of the most far-reaching and consequential statutes that the Congress ever has enacted.

There wasn’t a single special-interest provision in the Clean Air and Water Pollution Control Acts, nor, for that matter, in the War Powers Act and the Budget Act — all landmark laws authored and shepherded through the Senate by Muskie, one of the master legislative craftsmen in American history.

How does the Senate’s health-care bill match up against the Smith-Muskie-Snowe standard?  There are special Christmas gifts for the State of Nebraska (additional Medicaid money and other special benefits), the States of North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and Montana (increased Medicare payments), and a single medical school in Pennsylvania ($100 million).  And don’t miss the stocking stuffers for the State of Iowa (higher Medicare payments to hospitals in three Iowa counties) and our neighbors in Massachusetts and Vermont (hundreds of millions of dollars for expanded Medicaid coverage).  Oh, and the folks in Nebraska get that last bennie, too.

And what does the rest of America get?  Quite a lot — but only if you’re a health insurance company.  The health insurance industry — whose premiums in Maine have risen nearly five times faster than our household incomes over the last decade —  hijacked the debate in the Senate and made out like bandits.  Health insurers will get 31 million new customers with premiums paid in part by the federal government, with no competition from a public option and no real requirement that they help contain mushrooming costs of care. 

What about you and me? 

Well, thanks to the Senate majority, if you’re a woman covered by subsidized health insurance and you want to exercise your freedom of choice, you’ll have to write a separate check of your own for abortion coverage — whether you can afford it or not — and states can prohibit insurance companies from offering abortion coverage at all.  And don’t expect any genuine competition among the health insurance companies, because there’s no public plan as an option.  To boot, the Democrats caved in the late innings and agreed to leave the health insurance companies largely exempt from the nation’s antitrust laws.  

Neither is this legislation likely to contain the soaring costs of health insurance and medical care; there are almost no provisions in the bill to discourage payments for procedures, or to require the kinds of reforms that demonstrably have contained health care costs wherever they have been implemented — that is, incentives for good performance and healthy outcomes on the part of providers and behavioral changes that promote better health on the part of consumers.

In Maine today, we know what it is like to live with a health insurance monopoly. It isn’t good.  It certainly isn’t “the way life should be.” 

It doesn’t have to be this way!  

We can cut the cost of health care in Maine and make Maine the healthiest state in America.  Health care in Maine can work . . . for all of us . . . but not without some changes in the ways we provide it and pay for it.

For starters, we need to agree that our health care system should not be organized around the health insurance industry, according to their rules and designed to safeguard their profits. 

We can bring health care costs under control in Maine by ending Dirigo and MaineCare and by providing essential health care services for all Maine citizens through Maine Wellness,a new statewide framework within which coverage and care will be provided at a price that Maine businesses and taxpayers can afford, while preserving individual choice and the important relationships between patients and caregivers.

 The Maine Wellness framework will be based on these three principles:

       1. All Mainers should have access to essential healthcare services.

       2. The program must be financially sound and sustainable.

       3. We will reward healthy behaviors and pay for healthy outcomes, de-emphasizing payments for procedures as much as possible, because many of the diseases we pay to treat are preventable.

Our program will borrow from the highly successful efforts undertaken by Cianbro, Hussey Seating and other large Maine employers, who have succeeded dramatically in controlling costs and providing incentives for people to stop smoking, to lose weight and to take better care of themselves.

Maine Wellness will be built on the foundation of Maine’s strong system of non-profit hospitals, and we will work closely with groups of providers and insurance companies to build a system that stresses proper incentives, cost-effective performance, quality care and outcomes and accountability on all sides.

The Senate has allowed itself to be railroaded by a group of special interests that appear singularly intent on preserving profits.  When I am governor, we will put in place in Maine a program that is built for Maine, a program that Maine can afford and a program that contains costs and delivers real reform.


The Supplemental Budget Is A Travesty

December 21st, 2009

However much we might sympathize with the tough jam in which Governor Baldacci finds himself, there is no excuse — none — for the failure of leadership that the new supplemental budget represents.

Governors are elected to face the music and to lead the state, in good times or in bad. This is a bad time, to be sure, and the state government needs major surgery . . . maybe even an amputation or two.

But instead of facing the music and proposing the kinds of fundamental changes we need to make Maine work again, the Governor’s supplemental budget avoids the tough calls, relies on the most transparent gimmickry and fails the test of leadership.

Here are just a few of the issues that I have raised that the new budget fails to address:

– We need to authorize charter schools, measure teacher performance and pay for innovation, quality and efficiency in pre-K-12 education.

– We should merge our community college and university systems, so that we can better prepare our kids for jobs in Maine and in the knowledge economy at costs we can afford.

– We ought to reduce the number of non-profit organizations under contract to DHHS from 7,000 (!) to a more rational and manageable number that will deliver needed services at less cost.

– Let’s put an end to mandatory vehicle safety inspections, a leftover program from days when cars were not nearly as safe and reliable as they are today.

– It’s time to come to grips with the runaway costs of health care in Maine by replacing the Dirigo and MaineCare programs with a new framework that provides access to essential health care services for every Maine citizen at a cost that we can afford.  (Does Governor Baldacci really believe that the new federal legislation will cure this problem for us?  I don’t.  See Merry Christmas, Nebraska.)

Instead of proposing the kinds of major surgery that the state government needs, the Governor’s new budget prescribes the political equivalent of sugar pills:

– More across-the-board cuts (one of the worst cop-outs of all), including three more government shutdown days. (At this rate, we might as well opt for a part-time government.)

– Tooth fairy gimmicks like a “new” program to collect overdue taxes and hoped-for but uncommitted additional revenues from Uncle Sam, whose printing press is about to be turned off.

– Robbing Peter to pay Paul by making transfers to the General Fund from special funds like the state employees health insurance fund (thereby adding even more to the $3 billion in unfunded liabilities), the workers’ compensation fund and other cash balances in special-purpose funds. (This makes it look like the University of Maine System budget . . .)

– Passing the buck by delaying payments to towns and cities.

– And in a shell game that constitutes perhaps the worst example of budget shenanigans, the Governor came up with the last big chunk of what is now estimated to be a $438 million shortfall by “borrowing” $93.5 million from Other Special Revenue Funds on June 30 and then paying it back 24 hours later on July 1.  (This would be as if you or I paid our overdue credit card balances with another credit card.)

This budget would put our bond ratings at risk, perpetuate all of the structural deficiencies that caused the problems in the first place and constitutes the strongest possible argument that could be made for a BRAC-type process of government reorganization, a proposal that I made in my announcement speech.

We’ll see what the legislature does with the travesty of a budget that the Governor has turned over to them, but nothing so far suggests that the political parties that got us into this mess are going to get us out of it.


My Announcement Speech for Maine 2010

December 14th, 2009

Good morning.

During the past several months, I have traveled to all corners of Maine – from South Berwick to Eastport; from Presque Isle, Greenville and Rangeley to the coast; to Maine’s largest cities and to some of our smallest towns. I have visited with Maine voters in all 16 counties.

Mainers are worried and discouraged and angry. They don’t believe that their state government is on their side. They believe it is too big, too remote, leaderless and broken.

Maine people want Maine to work again, for all of us, and I know that Maine can work.

Mainers want strong, experienced and independent leadership in the Blaine House, and I am ready to provide it.

Today, I am proud to announce that I am a candidate to be Maine’s next governor… and I intend to be elected our governor in November, 2010.

As I have traveled the state, people have told me, over and over, that more than anything they want a candid assessment of Maine’s problems and a smart and focused strategy for fixing them.

Let’s begin with candor.

Maine is a wonderful place to live, but only if you can make a living. You can’t eat the view.

For thousands of our neighbors, Maine just doesn’t work. There aren’t enough jobs, and too many of those that we have don’t pay enough to put food on our tables, to put gas in our cars, to heat our homes and to provide real opportunity for our children. Maine families are struggling.

Businesses aren’t coming to Maine in sufficient numbers, and those that are here don’t expand, because the costs of living and doing business in Maine are too high. We already are the oldest state in America, and we are getting older, as more and more of our young people leave.

We need more jobs and higher incomes in Maine. We need to rebuild a thriving and prosperous economy. But what we don’t need is a governor who pulls the wool over our eyes, promises to put on a white lab coat, do some hocus pocus and create jobs out of thin air.

Let’s be honest. Governments can only create the conditions in which people and businesses can succeed; but that is real, that is a lot, and state government in Maine hasn’t done that. What we need to do is to cut the costs of living and doing business in Maine. And we need a state government with a plan to do that and a leader with the independence to see it through. Period.

Maine can work. We can generate jobs and incomes, we can position Maine for an era of sustainable prosperity, and we can keep our kids in Maine.

There are three big levers that we can use to cut the costs of living and doing business in Maine – to transform Maine’s economy. We can:

  1. lower the cost of electricity
  2. lower the cost of health care
  3. lower the cost of government.

First, I am tired of seeing electricity in Maine exported out of state to create jobs and incomes somewhere else. I want to put that electricity to work in Maine, generating jobs and incomes right here, all across our state.

We will create Maine Energy Resources, a public power authority that will use low-cost, tax-exempt capital to generate electricity throughout Maine from our renewable resources, invest in Maine energy efficiency, and enter into public-private partnerships with energy entrepreneurs to build needed energy facilities. Maine Energy Resources will put the electricity to work in Maine, lowering costs for Maine businesses and homeowners.

Second, I don’t want to see another decade like this one, when health insurance premiums in Maine have risen nearly five times faster than our household incomes, as essential health care has been priced out of the reach of thousands of Maine citizens.

We will end taxpayer-supported health care programs that haven’t worked and slim down those that we can’t afford. Rapidly rising health insurance costs are breaking the backs of Maine employers, keeping new businesses away and crippling Maine’s working families, who pay too great a portion of their wages for health care.

We will provide essential health care services for all Maine citizens through Maine Wellness, a new statewide framework where coverage and care will be provided at a price that Maine businesses and taxpayers can afford, preserving individual choice and the important relationships between patients and caregivers.

Maine Wellness will be based on three principles:

  1. All Mainers should have access to essential health care services.
  2. The program must be financially sound and sustainable.
  3. We will reward healthy behaviors and pay for healthy outcomes, de-emphasizing payments for procedures as much as possible, because many of the diseases we pay to treat are preventable.

Like the highly successful efforts undertaken by Cianbro, Hussey and other Maine employers, who have succeeded dramatically in controlling costs, Maine Wellness will provide incentives for people to stop smoking, to lose weight and to take better care of themselves. And Maine Wellness will be built on the foundation of Maine’s strong system of non-profit hospitals and committed physicians and caregivers.

Third, our state government is too remote, too big, too unfriendly and too expensive. We pay for too many things that we don’t need or can’t afford, and we pay too much to deliver what we do need. Customer service isn’t always what it should be, either. We need to make fundamental changes, and we need to cut our costs.

No more tinkering around the edges. No more “patching and praying” every month when falling revenues need to be balanced against expensive obligations. No more expensive consultants to tell us again what we already know. It is time to set priorities and make hard decisions about what we can, and cannot, afford.

I will personally convene and chair the Maine Change task force to do the tough work of deciding what stays and what goes. I will ask the Legislature to support the changes we propose in a BRAC-type process, one up or down vote, so that these needed reforms don’t become the victims of special interests and partisan politics.

If we are honest with ourselves, we will acknowledge that our high cost structure has built a wall around the State of Maine, one that discourages new businesses from investing here. And behind that wall we have failed to invest in a focused way in those assets that give Maine a competitive advantage.

Once we have cut our costs – once we have begun to lower the costs of living and doing business in Maine – we need to bring a new, strategic and far more focused approach to investing in Maine’s competitive advantages – our people, our places of character and our natural resources, and our strategic location.

The most important of those new investments will be in the training and education of our young people.

Public education in Maine today is organized to fail, and we are increasingly failing our children.

Our education system from kindergarten through college and beyond is fragmented, uncoordinated and filled with duplication. We will change that.

I will not rest until every Maine child has an equal opportunity to succeed.

  • We will seek out innovation and loosen rules and requirements in order to foster better education at lower costs.
  • We will measure performance and efficiency in K-12 public education and use those measures to incentivize and reward excellence and creativity where it is being achieved most cost-effectively.
  • We will authorize charter schools and charter districts and will make underutilized assets available for their use and for additional magnet schools, so that investments we already have made continue to yield returns.
  • And we will merge our two systems of higher education into one, making sure that we are managing and building that system in ways that will best serve our students and our state.

In November 2010, Maine voters must decide who has the best vision for Maine’s future. The questions they will be asking are important:

  • Who has the best strategy to make Maine work again?
  • Who will be independent enough to tell the truth and to place the interests of all Mainers above the narrow interests of one political party or another, one interest group or another?
  • Who has the business and public service experience, the proven political and leadership skills, and the independence and toughness to get the job done?

I was born and raised in Bangor. My family has lived in Maine for 130 years, since the 1880s. Dad was from Old Town, and my mother was from Bangor.

My grandfather, my mother’s father, came to America at the age of 12 – alone, with no family and unable to speak English. He began his life here as a peddler, walking between Bangor and Calais and selling notions, needles and thread to homes along what is now Route 9, the “Airline.”

I learned in Bangor, from my parents, grandparents and teachers, the values that have served me all my life:

  • Honesty and integrity
  • Compassion and charity
  • Discipline and hard work.

I worked through college and graduate school, learned politics from Ed Muskie and have spent a lifetime as a successful businessman, public official and lawyer. I am an experienced manager and entrepreneur, and I know government. I know how to change policies, reshape priorities, cut budgets and zero out programs that don’t work because I have done all those things.

Now I want to put my skills and experience to work for Maine . . . as Maine’s third Independent governor since 1974.

Most Maine people – whether they are enrolled as a Democrat or Republican or not enrolled in any party – are truly independent voters, and they know that the same tired old partisan politics that got us into this mess will never get us out of it. They know that real change will come only if Maine has a leader who can move beyond the tired rivalries that have left our major parties beholden to narrow interest groups and starved for new ideas.

As an Independent governor, I won’t worry about party bosses or catering to the extreme Left or the far Right. I won’t need to placate any special interest groups. I will work only for the hardworking voters and taxpayers of Maine.

Whatever you do, wherever you live in Maine, I will be your governor.

Most candidates for governor make too many promises to too many interest groups. I will make only three. I make them to every citizen of Maine, and these are what they are:

  1. One, I will tell the truth about our challenges and spell out the tough choices; I won’t sugarcoat anything.
  2. Two, I will give you a focused strategy that will fix Maine’s problems and restore opportunity.
  3. Three, I will inspire you to believe, as I do, in a bright vision of Maine’s future. I will work from dawn until night, every single day, to bring Maine together as One Maine, one community that shares one vision, so that together we can make that vision real.

Maine can work. I wouldn’t be running if I didn’t believe that with all my heart. The challenges before us are great, but the opportunities in front of us are even greater.

We can get Maine people back to work. We can create opportunities for our young people. We can create a government that we can afford, that is innovative and that provides great customer service. Maine can be the smartest, the healthiest, and the most dynamic state in America.

That is why I want to be Maine’s next governor, and that is what we will do together.

Thank you.


Charter Schools: The Democrats’ Final Fall

November 25th, 2009

Now that the protracted debate about school consolidation at least is off the ballot and out of the headlines, maybe, just maybe, Mainers on both sides of that issue will shift their attention to some of the more fundamentally important questions about K-12 education in Maine.

-Why are we spending so much on public education in Maine and apparently getting so little in return?

-Teachers are the most expensive component in our under-performing systems. Maine has great teachers in our public school systems, some of the very best in America. But why do we have so many teachers per pupil?

-Why aren’t we measuring excellence, performance and efficiency and rewarding school systems that achieve excellence at the lowest cost?

-Teachers, legislators and the governor are wailing over some of the deepest cuts in state aid to public education in history. So, why did those same teachers, those same legislators and the same governor just walk away from from an opportunity to collect millions and millions of dollars in federal funding for our public schools?

Maine voters interested in answers ought to examine the cozy relationship between the Maine Education Association (the teachers’ union) and the leadership of the Democratic Party in Maine.

Last week Education Commissioner Susan Gendron informed the Legislature’s Education Committee that the Baldacci Administration will not submit to the Legislature a bill to permit charter schools in Maine.

I wrote Governor Baldacci last week asking him to reconsider his decision. I also emailed Senator Bill Diamond (D-Windham) and Representative Emily Cain (D-Orono), the chairs of the legislature’s Appropriations Committee, where the funding cuts for public schools will be determined, and I urged them to take action to bring charter school legislation back before the Maine Senate in order to potentially offset some of those losses.

The decision not to reopen the charter school issue is tragic, crassly political and wrong. It constitutes a huge blow to our best educators and to parents all over Maine who have pushed for this legislation. They believe that charter schools are a chance to innovate and experiment in ways that ultimately can benefit all schools in Maine. (It’s not as if Maine schools couldn’t stand a little innovation. Just recently a bipartisan report from the Center for American Progress and two other think tanks ranked Maine 44th among all states in educational innovation, concluding that “Maine does a poor job managing its schools in a way that encourages thoughtful innovation.”)

This decision is also terribly costly. A law permitting charter schools would make Maine eligible to receive a share of $4 billion of funding through the Race to the Top program. Race to the Top was created by the Obama administration earlier this year in an effort to bring more schools up to par with national education standards. Maine is now one of only a handful of states that won’t be eligible for any of that money.

It is hard to find anyone opposed to a law that would simply authorize (not require) charter schools – other than the powerful teachers’ union and its allies in the Maine Democratic Party.

Why is the teachers’ union opposed? Because the union contract wouldn’t govern hiring, salaries and benefits in charter schools.

Why is that a threat to the teachers’ union? Because Maine’s ratio of classroom teachers to pupils now has become the second highest among all the states, fully 25 percent worse than the national average.

Too many teachers, too little innovation, not enough excellence… and a refusal to take federal money in the midst of a budget crisis because some or all of those circumstances might have to change. This is what Maine parents want for their kids?

The Democratic Party in Maine was once a great reformist party. For more than 25 years, from its rebirth in the late 1940s, the Democrats were a party committed to maximizing opportunity for all the people of Maine. Sadly, the party has become an inbred shadow of its former self. Saddled with so many political obligations to so many interest groups that it seemingly can’t keep them straight, the Democratic Party leadership is apparently incapable of embracing new ideas and committed only to maximizing opportunity for whichever one of its allies is next in line at the public trough.

Partisanship and close ties to special interests – in this case the teachers’ union – once again have trumped the public interest in Augusta: no charter schools, no Race to the Top funding.

This time, the real losers are our kids.


100-20+0=?

November 13th, 2009

The arithmetic isn’t hard. Any third grader in Maine could figure out the answer to this problem. Yet, the answer seems to have eluded their state fathers and mothers!

Dwindling state revenues are forcing state officials to make massive cuts — millions of dollars — in the state’s share of funding for K-12 education in Maine’s public schools. At the same time, the federal Department of Education is getting ready to hand out hundreds of millions of dollars to states in the Race to the Top program.

But not to Maine. MPBN reports that Maine will be standing in the corner, likely ineligible to receive our share. Why? Because we are one of the few states left in America where charter schools are not allowed. Indeed, in a recent, bipartisan joint report that reviewed programs in all 50 states, conservative and progressive national think tanks ranked Maine’s K-12 education performance near the bottom, concluding that “Maine does a poor job managing its schools in a way that encourages thoughtful innovation.” (Read the entire report here. Click on the map of Maine to see the report on Maine.)

All states are suffering today. But while other states will find some federal funds landing in their coffers to ease the pain in local school districts, Maine won’t. Can’t our state leaders add and subtract?

Now would be a good time for the Maine Legislature to reexamine the policy prohibiting charter schools…and to fix it.


State Employees, Public Service and Customer Service

November 1st, 2009

Last Friday evening I drove to Rockland to meet with leaders of the SEIU, the union that represents most of Maine’s state employees (you can view the video here). I was the first of several candidates who spoke, and I discussed with them some of the challenges that we would face together when I become governor. Among other things, I told them that I think we need to work hard on making customer service part of public service.

Many Mainers, I told them, believe that state government is too remote, too big, too unfriendly, leaderless and just plain broken. They think that we pay for too many things that we don’t need or can’t afford, that we pay too much to deliver what we do need, and that customer service from state employees isn’t always as good as it should be. . . We need to change that, I said.

Well, you’d have thought that I was a traitor to our state! One of my opponents — I won’t name names because I don’t want to embarrass her — took to the podium a few minutes later and positively denounced me. “Maine people aren’t customers of the state government,” she yelled. “We are the owners!”

Well, yes, we are the owners.  We certainly are taxpayers.  But we are also the customers of state government.

When was the last time a state inspector came to your business and apologized to you as a government “owner” for interrupting your workday and asked how he or she could help you?

When was the last time that you walked into a Department of Motor Vehicles office and felt like an owner and not a customer?

Read in the continuation what I had to say to the SEIU.

My name is Eliot Cutler, and I am looking forward to working hand in hand with you as Maine’s next governor.

I will be your governor, your leader, but I also want to be your partner. We will share the toughest assignment state employees have ever had. You know as well as I do that the next 10 years will be the single most challenging decade in Maine’s history.

We need to get Maine people back to work, raise income levels and restore our tax base. To do that, we must focus on strategies that will make a difference everywhere in Maine.

We need to cut the cost of living and cost of doing business in Maine, so that we can make the most of our competitive advantages. We need to lower our energy costs, especially the cost of electricity. We need to lower our health care costs, while making essential health care services available to everyone in Maine. And we have to invest in education, while doing a much better job of using the education assets we have.

Those tasks would be challenging in the best of circumstances, but this is no ordinary time. While we work to reinvigorate our economy, we also must reduce government spending – maybe by as much as 20 percent on top of the cuts already made. We must make state government more efficient and more innovative. And we will need to do all of this while rebuilding the trust and confidence of Maine citizens in their state government.

I know how hard most of you work, and I know just how dedicated most of you are to your work and to the people whom you serve. But, folks, we have a problem. I have spent the past four months driving all over our state, listening to our customers — Mainers from all walks of life. Let me tell you what I have heard from them:

Many believe that Maine has lost its way. Many believe that state government is too remote, too big, too unfriendly, leaderless and broken. They think that we pay for too many things that we don’t need or can’t afford, that we pay too much to deliver what we do need, and that customer service from our state employees isn’t always as good as it should be.

During the past two weeks alone, I asked three big employers — at a lumber mill, a manufacturer and a large farm — whether anyone from state government had visited them in the past seven or eight years to ask them how they were doing, what they needed, how could Maine help them grow. And from each of them the answer was no.

We need to change that.

We need to work on the customer service part of public service. We need to give every state employee a reason to be proud of being one; every one of you should be respected, liked and admired in your communities and by the people you serve.

Bluntly, the time for tinkering on the margins is over. We need to make fundamental changes in how we deliver state services and how we spend the hard-earned money Maine people pay in taxes. We need to focus on efficiency, performance, customer service and accountability.

The point is this: We need to keep people from wishing that they had voted for Tabor I, stop giving people reasons to vote for Tabor II, and see to it that there is no foundation left for Tabor III.

We need to make Maine work again for Maine people.

We can make it work. Maine can work better for all of us. . . but only if we share a common vision for Maine’s future, if we stick to a focused strategy for making it happen and if we change some of the ways we govern ourselves and deliver public services in Maine.

You folks hold the keys, so here is the bargain that I want to strike with you:

You have the ideas. You know what we need to do. If there are laws that we need to change because they are contributing to our problems, rather than helping to solve them, I want to know. If there are rules we should get rid of because they don’t work, tell me. If there are better ways to do what we need to do, I’ll be all ears.

For my part, I will lead you, I will challenge you, I will empower you and I will figure out how to reward you. I promise you that.

Let’s all remember this:

Dirigo is our state motto. It means, I Lead. The job of leadership belongs to every one of us, every state employee. I want Dirigo to mean something again in Augusta, in the Blaine House, and to be a source of pride for every public servant in the great State of Maine.

I don’t care if you are a Democrat, a Republican, a Green or an Independent. If you have the pride in Maine that I have, if you love Maine as I do, then you can stand with me and work with me. Maine can work again . . . for all of us.


Moving On From The Debate Over Consolidation

November 1st, 2009

Many people across Maine have asked me how I intend to vote on the contentious issue of school consolidation — Question 3 on next Tuesday’s ballot.

I answered that question in an television interview with Augusta schools superintendent Connie Brown several weeks ago, and again just this past Friday in response to a question from blogger Derek Viger of The Maine View.  Regardless of what happens on Tuesday, we need to sit down and figure out the answers to much bigger questions about K-12 education in Maine.  There are much bigger issues at stake here than whether or not we consolidate schools. The important questions are whether our schools are producing excellence. Are our kids getting a quality education? And, are we doing so at costs we can afford to pay?

Please read the rest of this blog to see what I have said on this critical challenge.

There’s are much bigger issues at stake here than whether or not we consolidate schools in Maine. The important questions are whether our schools are producing excellence. Are our kids getting a quality education? And, are we doing so at costs we can afford to pay?

Those are the central questions facing our education system. And the answers are going to be different in different parts of the state. Because of that, consolidation isn’t the right answer everywhere.

With that said, I’m going to vote to sustain the enacted school consolidation law because I think it’s a set of tools that we just can’t throw out. I think we need to take what’s there and fix it.

The issues to me with Maine’s K-12 education come down to equities, excellence, efficiency and cost-effective performance.

Every kid in Maine should have an opportunity for an excellent education. I believe every kid in Maine should be able to stay in school and to be excited about it. I don’t believe we can write off kids in one part of the state or another part of the state. That’s just not the right approach. As governor, I simply won’t permit it. Our kids are too important.  They need and deserve more from us.

Now, we need to figure out how to correct inequities and achieve excellence in a more cost-effective way, because in the next few fiscal years in Maine, we are going to have a budget crunch the likes of which we’ve never seen before. There’s going to be a lot of pressure to cut spending on state aid to K-12 education because it’s such a big part of our state budget. When that happens, some towns in Maine are going to be just fine because they can raise the money to make up the difference. But there are a lot of towns in Maine where they are not going to have that opportunity. So the gap is going to grow and not narrow.

We need to figure out how to narrow that gap – even in tough budget times — because all Maine kids are our kids, and every single one of them is entitled to a great education.


My Vision for Health Care in Maine: Universal Care, Lower Costs and a Giant Lever for Growth

October 26th, 2009

The median U.S. household income has decreased 3.6 percent this year, yet health insurance premiums are projected to increase 9 percent nationally.  In Maine, Anthem wants a hike of 18 percent.  This outrageous news comes on the heels of a decade (from 2000 to 2009) when health insurance premiums in Maine rose 4.6 times faster than our household incomes!

Something is terribly, terribly wrong. Yet, notwithstanding the tireless efforts of Senator Snowe to achieve meaningful reform at the federal level, the health care debate in Congress appears to have sailed right past the most important point. We need to stop arguing about who pays and start thinking about what we are paying for!

A recent story in the Bangor Daily News reported on a new, low-cost health care plan that has been organized by a group of Rhode Island physicians.

“I’d do this tomorrow . . . ,” said Maine’s own Dr. Michael Clark of Damariscotta.  “To be able to deliver care to my lobstermen and carpenters and all the small businessmen . . . The big excitement is not to get a few more bucks per person. It’s to deliver care that aligns with my values and my conscience, and that is the care that our patients want.”

That is exactly the kind of care that we ought to be able to provide to everyone in Maine. And when I am governor, we will do that.

Whether we like it or not, and whether we realize it or not, we are all paying for each other’s health care today – and we are paying far, far too much for it. We are all paying high prices for unnecessary visits to hospital emergency rooms; we are paying billions of dollars in advertising, overhead and profits to health insurance companies; we are paying billions more to make up for the shortfalls in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements; and we are paying for expensive treatments and remedies for conditions that could have been prevented.This is an unnecessary handicap on Maine’s working families, who pay too much and sacrifice too much in wages for health care, and it is a burden that is breaking the back of Maine employers, for whom high health care costs are one of the most important factors making it difficult to do business in Maine.

The Dirigo health insurance program was an important attempt at reform. It signaled Maine’s intent to make essential health care services accessible to all. It was well-intentioned, but it just didn’t work as intended. It covers too few of those who need coverage, and it does so at too high of a cost. We need to replace it with something better and more cost-effective.

We also need to lower Maine’s high Medicaid expense, which is way, way above the national average, primarily because of unusually broad eligibility and a scope of services that is far beyond what is available in other states. Instead of programs that aren’t working and insurance coverage that is beyond our means, we can fashion a broader program that provides access to essential health care services for all Maine citizens at a price that Maine businesses and taxpayers can afford.

We can make health care in Maine work . . . for all of us. To do so, we need a focused strategy based on three important principles.

First, all Mainers should have access to essential health care services. We need to protect people from the ruinous economic consequences of unanticipated illness, the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in our state and in the country, so adequate coverage must include coverage for catastrophic illness. We must not forget that the reasons why Medicaid coverage in Maine is so broad and why we conceived and enacted the Dirigo program were good and sound reasons; we are compassionate, generous and decent people in Maine, and we should not desert those principles.

Second, however, our program must be fiscally sound. We need to draw bounds around what we can afford to provide. We no longer can afford to indulge our very best instincts – our compassion, generosity and decency – without regard to what it costs to do so.

And third, we have to stop paying for procedures and start paying for good health. We can develop a program that learns and borrows from the highly successful efforts undertaken by Cianbro, Hussey and some of Maine’s other large employers; one that builds on Maine’s strong systems of non-profit hospitals, committed physicians and caregivers, and one that incentivizes and pays for healthy behaviors and healthy outcomes. Many of the diseases we pay to treat are preventable. We need to create incentives for people to stop smoking, to lose weight and to take better care of themselves. That is the only way that we are going to bring costs under control, and it is the only way as a society and as a community that we will be able to afford broad access to essential care.

Maine can work.  Providing high quality, affordable health care for every citizen is one of the biggest levers we have to lower the costs of living and doing business in Maine . . . and it is one of the most important ways in which we can make sure that Maine works for all of us.

Home | About Eliot | Vision | Our Strategy | News | Blog | Join Us | Donate
@2009, Authorized by Eliot R. Cutler and paid for by Cutler 2010. | Site by Raka