Posts Tagged ‘Bonds’

Exclusive Interview with Eliot Cutler (Third Party and Independent Daily)

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Political blog, Third Party and Independent Daily, recently conducted an email interview with Eliot on the independent political movement and key issues in the upcoming Maine gubernatorial election. Please see the complete interview below:

TPID: Why do Maine voters appear to be so open to competitive three-person races and independent governance? Given national trends, the state’s history of independent governors and competitive three-person races is anomalous.

Cutler: The people of Maine pride themselves on their independence and this affects how we vote as well. Independent, or unenrolled, voters are the largest single voting bloc in Maine and the vast majority of those who belong to a political party in Maine are “independent” voters in the sense that do not always vote a straight party ballot. Two of the last five governors in Maine have been Independents, and I believe the voters will make it three for six this fall. While you characterize Maine as anomalous, I prefer to characterize Maine as being out in front of the rest of the country in terms of putting the person ahead of the party!

TPID: Ahead of the Democratic and Republican primaries, the race is wide open, with many undecided voters. What are going to be decisive issues in this campaign?

Cutler: The decisive issues will be who has the best plan to get Maine’s economy moving again and creating jobs, and who has the experience, competence and leadership skills to turn our state around. I have put forth a plan to lower the cost of energy, healthcare, and government — our major barriers to job creation — and to invest in Maine’s competitive advantages (much more at cutler2010.com). Party labels and ideology will be irrelevant, or at least secondary issues, in this year’s race.

TPID: Why have you opted to run outside of the two-party system? How will an independent governor work with a state legislature dominated by Democrats and Republicans?

Cutler: I am running as an Independent because I am one. When I worked for Sen. Edmund Muskie and President Jimmy Carter, the Democratic Party was the party of reform. I believe that at least in Maine, it no longer is. I left the Democratic Party in 2005 when the current Democratic governor tried to borrow money in the bond market to pay current government operating expenses; I thought that was fiscally irresponsible. I also had become increasingly dissatisfied with the straightjacket in which the state Democratic Party found itself as a consequence of the Party’s increasing servitude to public employees’ unions.

I supported a moderate Republican who lost his party’s primary to a social conservative in the 2006 governor’s race. I have since concluded that the leadership of both parties has become captive to the various special interests that control them and that they are both incapable of governing from the moderate center. I am committed to doing that and to giving voice and representation to what I believe is an overwhelming majority of independent and moderate Maine voters who want to see Maine government work again.

I will work with a state legislature dominated by Democrats and Republicans by providing strong leadership, outlining a clear vision for our state, embracing good ideas regardless of which party offers them, and making my case directly to the people of Maine whenever I need to. My whole career has been about bringing people together to accomplish things that others said couldn’t be done.

TPID: What are your stances on Tuesday’s various ballot measures?

Cutler: Question 1 — tax reform. I will vote to sustain the new law because to the extent that it moves Maine towards taxing consumption, as opposed to income and investment, it is moving the state in the right direction. I believe we should give the law a chance. Neither supporters nor opponents of the repeal can predict with real certainty what the impact will be, but I have pledged that if the law does not live up to its promise of reducing the overall tax burden on Maine people or proves to be a detriment to job creation and investment in our state, then as governor I will be the first to call for changes.

Bonds – 2, 3, 4, 5. Although I am concerned about the state’s indebtedness, especially unfunded pension liabilities, I will vote for the various bond issues in hopes that the money will attract additional investment that will have a positive impact on the state’s economy.

TPID: In recent weeks and months, the Democratic and Republican Governors Associations have strongly attacked promising independent candidates for governor in the northeast, specifically Tim Cahill in Massachusetts and Lincoln Chafee in Rhode Island. In April, there was some tension between your campaign and the RGA because of the video “tracker” they had hired to follow you. Has anything come of that, have they let up or doubled down, or has is just become part of the campaign’s backdrop?

Cutler: As for the RGA and DGA, we expect similar attacks here in Maine. The tracker issue was around the woman lying to me about who she was and what she was doing at a candidates’ forum far from her home. The insiders thought it was no big deal, but we sure heard a lot of disgust from regular voters. It’s just part of the backdrop for now.

TPID: Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions!


Eliot Responds to Request for Comment on Democrat’s Proposed ‘Jobs Bond Package’ (Augusta Insider)

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Derek Viger from blog Augusta Insider recently asked for Eliot to comment on the $99.2 million “jobs bond package” proposed by Maine’s Democratic leaders. Below is Eliot’s response:

Borrowed money isn’t free.

We need to pay it back, and we need to pay interest on the debt. That is why I believe that every cent we invest in roads, rail, and other infrastructure projects – whether from tax revenues, from Federal funds or from the proceeds of bond issues — should reflect decisions made in the context of a capital budget that sets priorities and that seeks to leverage Maine’s competitive advantages. That is the way to maximize job creation and economic development. And that is the kind of disciplined stewardship of their tax dollars that Maine people need and want.

Sen. [Libby] Mitchell and the Democrats haven’t told us very much about the projects that they want to fund with this bond issue. I know as well as anyone that many of Maine’s roads and bridges need repair, and the threatened loss of rail service in northern Maine is a grave concern for all of us. Yet, many Maine cities and towns have projects in mind that they would nominate for consideration in a special bond issue, but I suspect that they have not be included in this process. That’s the problem, and that’s a real issue.

There may well be elements of this proposal that deserve support, but I would want to be assured that they have been carefully considered in terms of priorities and impact. I don’t see any rational, disciplined process behind this proposal. Frankly, I wish that the Democratic leaders would also put a real effort into making Maine a more affordable and inviting place to do business. That would really create lasting jobs.

I also want to be assured that this new proposal is fully aligned with the bond package approved by the Legislature last June, the first installment of which was approved by the voters in November, and not simply added on top of that package for short-term political gain.

You can read the complete article here with Eliot’s comments highlighted in yellow.